Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saito, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sinohara, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saito, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sinohara, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J. Biochem, 1988, Vol. 103, No. 2 247-253
© 1988 Japanese Biochemical Society


research-article

Differential Interactions of Rabbit Plasma {alpha}-1-Antiproteinases S and F with Porcine Trypsin

Akio Saito and Hyogo Sinohara1

Department of Biochemistry, Kinki University School of Medicine Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589

1Two whome correspondence should be addressed.

Two major forms of rabbit plasma {alpha}-1-antiproteinase, S and F, were separated by affinity chromatography on Red Sepharose, and their modes of interaction with porcine trypsin were studied. The S form interacted with trypsin much more slowly than the F form, and the resulting complex partially retained the amidolytic and proteolytic activities towards benzoyl-L-arginine p-nitroanilide and remazol brilliant blue hide powder, respectively. This S form-trypsin complex also prevented the inactivation of bound trypsin by soybean trypsin inhibitor. In marked contrast, an equimolar complex of trypsin and the F form retained neither amidolytic nor proteolytic activity. These results suggest that the F form blocks the active site of trypsin while the S form does not bind directly to the active site, thereby preserving the catalytic potential of trypsin. No similar interaction was observed, however, between the S form and either bovine chymotrypsin or porcine pancreatic elastase. Both the S and F forms inactivated these proteinases in a stoichiometric manner with differing inhibitor/proteinase binding ratios. The S form showed about twofold greater capacity to inhibit elastase than the F form, whereas the reverse was the case for chymotrypsin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.