Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko-Ishino, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ishino, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko-Ishino, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ishino, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J. Biochem, 2003, Vol. 133, No. 6 699-711
© 2003 Japanese Biochemical Society


JB REVIEWS

The Regulation and Biological Significance of Genomic Imprinting in Mammals

Tomoko Kaneko-Ishino1,2, Takashi Kohda2,3 and Fumitoshi Ishino2,3,+

1 Tokai University, School of Health Sciences; 2 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation; and 3 Gene Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuda-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501

ABSTRACT

Genomic imprinting is a system of non-Mendelian inheritance that is unique to mammals. Two types of imprinted genes show parent-of-origin-specific expression patterns: the paternally expressed genes (Pegs), and the maternally expressed genes (Megs). Parental genomic imprinting memory is maintained in the somatic cell lineage and regulates the expression of Pegs and Megs, while it is erased and re-established in the germ cell lineage according to the sex of the individual. The paternal and maternal imprinting mechanisms, which regulate different sets of Pegs and Megs, are essential for establishing the parental expression profiles of imprinted genes that are observed in sperms and eggs. Based on recent evidence, we outline the relationship between parental imprinting and the expression profiles of Pegs and Megs and discuss a novel view of the regulation of genomic imprinting. We also discuss the biological significance of genomic imprinting and propose hypotheses on the essential nature of genomic imprinting and the close relationship between genomic imprinting and the acquisition of placental tissues during mammalian evolution.

FOOTNOTES

+ To whom correspondence should be addressed at the present address. Department of Epigenetics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0062. Tel: +81-3-5280-8072, E-mail: fishino.epgn{at}mri.tmd.ac.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. B Renfree, E. I Ager, G. Shaw, and A. J Pask
Genomic imprinting in marsupial placentation
Reproduction, November 1, 2008; 136(5): 523 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. T. Swaney, J. P. Curley, F. A. Champagne, and E. B. Keverne
Genomic imprinting mediates sexual experience-dependent olfactory learning in male mice
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 6084 - 6089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
I. Suetake, D. Hayata, and S. Tajima
The Amino-Terminus of Mouse DNA Methyltransferase 1 Forms an Independent Domain and Binds to DNA with the Sequence Involving PCNA Binding Motif
J. Biochem., December 1, 2006; 140(6): 763 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
I. Suetake, Y. Morimoto, T. Fuchikami, K. Abe, and S. Tajima
Stimulation Effect of Dnmt3L on the DNA Methylation Activity of Dnmt3a2
J. Biochem., October 1, 2006; 140(4): 553 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
H. Takeshima, I. Suetake, H. Shimahara, K. Ura, S.-i. Tate, and S. Tajima
Distinct DNA Methylation Activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b towards Naked and Nucleosomal DNA.
J. Biochem., March 1, 2006; 139(3): 503 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. K. Evans, J. R. Weidman, D. O. Cowley, and R. L. Jirtle
Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis of Blcap/Nnat Reveals Eutherian-Specific Imprinted Gene
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2005; 22(8): 1740 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Manandhar, H. Schatten, and P. Sutovsky
Centrosome Reduction During Gametogenesis and Its Significance
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 2 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
D. SOLTER, T. HIIRAGI, A.V. EVSIKOV, J. MOYER, W.N. DE VRIES, A.E. PEASTON, and B.B. KNOWLES
Epigenetic Mechanisms in Early Mammalian Development
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2004; 69(0): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. Lucifero, J.R. Chaillet, and J. M. Trasler
Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 3 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.