Skip Navigation

Journal of Biochemistry 2006 139(3):471-482; doi:10.1093/jb/mvj048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 The Japanese Biochemical Society.

Regular Paper

Freshwater Bioluminescence in Vibrio albensis (Vibrio cholerae biovar albensis) NCIMB 41 Is Caused by a Two-Nucleotide Deletion in luxO

Sabu Kasai*

Department of Applied Chemistry and Bioapplied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka City University, Sugimoto 3-3-138, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558-8585

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel/Fax: +81-6-6605-2783, E-mail: kasai{at}bioa.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp

We previously proposed that the function of the lux operon is to produce a halotolerant flavodoxin, FP390 or P-flavin binding protein, and not to produce light. A crucial basis of this hypothesis is that almost all species of luminous bacteria emit light in culture media containing over 2% NaCl. However, Vibrio albensis (Vibrio cholerae biovar albensis) NCIMB 41 emits light in freshwater and this appears to be in direct conflict with our hypothesis. To determine why this exceptional freshwater bioluminescence is emitted, we studied the lux operon and the regulatory system of the operon in this strain, and found that expression of the operon is regulated by a system involving a derivative of 4,5-dihydroxy 2,3-pentanedione, DPD, as an inducer, and the repressor gene for the lux operon, luxO, is damaged by deletion of two nucleotides. Furthermore, to study the effect of damage to the luxO gene, pUC18 derivatives containing the damaged and repaired luxO sequences were prepared. Cells transfected with the damaged luxO sequence emitted light like the parental strain, whereas ones transfected with the repaired one did so only sparingly. Here we show that the light emission in freshwater by this strain is not in conflict with our hypothesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. Ohnishi, M. Saito, S. Wakabayashi, M. Ishizuka, K. Nishimura, Y. Nagata, and S. Kasai
Purification and Characterization of Serine Racemase from a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon, Pyrobaculum islandicum
J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2008; 190(4): 1359 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J BiochemHome page
S. Kasai, K. Okada, A. Hoshino, T. Iida, and T. Honda
Lateral Transfer of the lux Gene Cluster
J. Biochem., February 1, 2007; 141(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.