Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ASHIBA, G.
Right arrow Articles by WATANABE, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ASHIBA, G.
Right arrow Articles by WATANABE, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J. Biochem, 1977, Vol. 81, No. 4 1025-1030
© 1977 Japanese Biochemical Society


research-article

A Study of {gamma} Component, a Myofibrillar Protein

Gaku ASHIBA and Shizuo WATANABE

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152

According to Arai and Watanabe (1968), {gamma} component is a contaminant protein in preparations of skeletal muscle troponin. In the present study we sought to determine whether {gamma} component and creatine kinase [E2.7.3.2.1 are identical. Both {gamma} component and creatine kinase were prepared from chicken breast muscle and compared in four different ways (a, b, c, and d). {gamma} component was shown in each of these ways to be different from creatine kinase.

a) As reported by Lee and Watanabe (1970), {gamma} component was obtained as a DEAE-cellulose flow-through fraction. No creatine kinase activity was detected in this fraction. Using the same conditions as for the {gamma} component preparation, creatine kinase preparations were all retained by DEAE-cellulose. b) In urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, {gamma} component hardly migrated towards the anode even at pH 9.6, whereas creatine kinase migrated readily. In SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis both component and creatine kinase migrated similarly, but the migration rate of {gamma} component was slightly faster than that of creatine kinase. c) Ouchterlony's immunodiffusion test with anti-creatine kinase serum of rabbit was performed, and no precipitin line was observed for {gamma} component. d) Component was found to be retained by CM-cellulose, and could thus be purified further by CM-cellulose chromatography with a KCl concentration gradient. The {gamma} component thus purified was used to obtain anti-{gamma} component serum from rabbit, and this antiserum did not form a precipitin line with creatine kinase.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.